> On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>
> > There's another variant that was proposed here, but hasn't yet
> > been implemented, and it's that the section wouldn't just be a
> > number. Instead, something like 1ssl, 3ssl, 5ssl and 7ssl would
> > be used. The result is that you'd get a threads(3ssl), err(3ssl),
> > passwd(1ssl), rc4(3ssl).
>
> Why not openssl_passwd, openssl_err, etc?
I think you missed the point I was making.
Why not ERR_get_error(3)?
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
