From: Bodo Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
moeller> On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 02:04:23AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
moeller>
moeller> > e_os.h and e_os2.h are not really very optimal. There are many times
moeller> > when e_os2.h should really be included from some exported header
moeller> > files, but that means immediately that e_os.h needs to be included as
moeller> > well.
moeller>
moeller> Why? Actually a number of exported header files *do* include e_os2.h
moeller> (without including e_os.h, which is not exported).
The conditionals in e_os2.h depend on macros defined in e_os.h. That
makes e_os2.h dependent on e_os.h, and the whole thing becomes ridiculous.
moeller> > ([...] we currently export e_os.h as well)
moeller>
moeller> Not really.
You'd better do the following, you're in for a surprise:
grep EXHEADER Makefile.org
moeller> However, e_os.h is not installed by "make install".
Oh yes, it is!
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
