On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 02:58:21PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>Bodo Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> If we rename such macros to OPENSSL_whatever, we can define them
>> whenever we feel like it. If they have generic names, we should
>> be more careful. I guess MSDOS wouldn't really hurt to much,
>> but that's about the limit.
> I was pondering some kind of name standard, like OPENSSL_SYS_os, to
> denote what platform we're on, and move all those definitions to
> e_os2.h. We could then define other macros based on those in the
> internal header. Does that sound like a good plan?
Yes, that's OK.
--
Bodo Möller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP http://www.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/TI/Mitarbeiter/moeller/0x36d2c658.html
* TU Darmstadt, Theoretische Informatik, Alexanderstr. 10, D-64283 Darmstadt
* Tel. +49-6151-16-6628, Fax +49-6151-16-6036
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
