In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 22 Jul
2002 08:00:23 -0700 (PDT), Doug Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
dkaufman> I am not sure that I understand the question. Where do I keep ".exe"
dkaufman> at the end? The end of what? After copying dummytest.c to ideatest.c
dkaufman> and compiling, I get the same result whether I execute as "./ideatest"
dkaufman> or as "./ideatest.exe", i.e., "No IDEA support". Sorry if I missed
dkaufman> something (I am not a programmer). I did not intend to change anything
dkaufman> in regard to suffixes.
The following change would keep ".exe" at the end of the string.
However, I recall that DOS would remove an extension, so even if you
type .\ideatest.exe, you end up with ".\ideatest" in argv[0]. This is
not the case on VMS.
--- test/dummytest.c 2002-07-22 18:11:18.000000000 +0200
+++ /home/levitte/dist/dummytest.c 2002-07-22 18:08:01.000000000 +0200
@@ -28,9 +27,8 @@
program = BUF_strdup("(unknown)");
else
{
- program = OPENSSL_malloc(q - p + 1);
- strncpy(program, p, q - p);
- program[q - p] = '\0';
+ program = OPENSSL_malloc(strlen(p) + 1);
+ strcpy(program, p);
}
for(p = program; *p; p++)
I understand, however, why you made that change, now that I looked a
little more closely at the rest of the changes. I made the following
change to your change:
--- /home/levitte/dist/dummytest.c 2002-07-22 18:08:01.000000000 +0200
+++ test/dummytest.c 2002-07-22 18:11:18.000000000 +0200
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
if (!p) p = strrchr(argv[0], ':');
q = 0;
#endif
+ if (p) p++;
if (!p) p = argv[0];
if (p) q = strchr(p, '.');
if (p && !q) q = p + strlen(p);
@@ -27,8 +28,9 @@
program = BUF_strdup("(unknown)");
else
{
- program = OPENSSL_malloc(strlen(p) + 1);
- strcpy(program, p);
+ program = OPENSSL_malloc(q - p + 1);
+ strncpy(program, p, q - p);
+ program[q - p] = '\0';
}
for(p = program; *p; p++)
@@ -38,7 +40,7 @@
if (q > p && q[-1] == '_') q--;
*q = '\0';
- printf("No %s support\n", program + 1);
+ printf("No %s support\n", program);
OPENSSL_free(program);
return(0);
dkaufman> With the changes, I can exclude algorithms (e.g. idea, rc5, and mdc2)
dkaufman> and can then do: make, make depend, make, make test, and make install
dkaufman> without any problems when running under DJGPP. I didn't test other
dkaufman> platforms.
Cool, thanks for testing.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
