On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:25:15PM +0100, Ernst G Giessmann via RT wrote:
> I guess that in this case
>
> =head1 B<NAME OPTIONS>
>
> is less opportunistic and therefore a bit better workaround saving the section
>name for the next generation ;-)
Ok, I have finally chosen another workaround: as "NAME OPTIONS" are just
a subset of all OPTIONS, I have adjusted the structre, such now NAME OPTIONS
is only a "=head2" section and does not longer create the problem.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
