Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:25:15PM +0100, Ernst G Giessmann via RT wrote:
>
> >     I guess that in this case
> >
> >     =head1 B
> >
> >     is less opportunistic and therefore a bit better workaround saving 
> the section name for the next generation ;-)
>
>
> Ok, I have finally chosen another workaround: as "NAME OPTIONS" are just
> a subset of all OPTIONS, I have adjusted the structre, such now NAME 
> OPTIONS
> is only a "=head2" section and does not longer create the problem.
>
> Best regards,
>       Lutz

Fine,
I guess that the TEXT OPTIONS became a head2 section too, isn't it?

BTW the problem in the 0.9.7 version didn't appear because the dirty 
section is renamed to "Subject and Issuer name options" ;-)

Regards,
Ernst

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to