On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:18:13AM +0100, Ernst G Giessmann via RT wrote:
>
> Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:25:15PM +0100, Ernst G Giessmann via RT wrote:
> >
> > > I guess that in this case
> > >
> > > =head1 B
> > >
> > > is less opportunistic and therefore a bit better workaround saving
> > the section name for the next generation ;-)
> >
> >
> > Ok, I have finally chosen another workaround: as "NAME OPTIONS" are just
> > a subset of all OPTIONS, I have adjusted the structre, such now NAME
> > OPTIONS
> > is only a "=head2" section and does not longer create the problem.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Lutz
>
> Fine,
> I guess that the TEXT OPTIONS became a head2 section too, isn't it?
Yes. I have adapted the structures accordingly, such that all "BLAH OPTIONS"
are subsections of the OPTIONS section.
> BTW the problem in the 0.9.7 version didn't appear because the dirty
> section is renamed to "Subject and Issuer name options" ;-)
This was the first workaround that now has been reverted.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
