> I agree completely. This was actually brought up a while ago by
> someone else (was that Dave Pawson, the one you're mentioning below?),
> and should probably have been discussed already then.
Yes, same guy. :)
> I think the only thing that's an obstacle
> for me is that the synopsis for C function declarations get quite
> complicated at times, and I've found no way to properly markup a
> function pointer parameter declaration in such way that it looks
> acceptable in the nroff output.
If you mail me some examples of what you have now, I'll pass it around and
see if any suggestions for improvement come back.
/r$
--
SOA Appliances
Application Integration Middleware
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [email protected]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
