Looks good to me. Shall we? :) -Kyle H
On 7/18/06, Dave Pawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/funcsynopsis.html Norm thinks he's fixed it. I can't argue. Do you guys agree with him, see the K&R vs Ansi examples? regards DaveP (See the support you get with docbook :-) > > Only parameterization is to use K&R or ANSI format (do you understand > > the difference?) > > /* K&R */ > int somefunc(x, y) > char *x, int *y > { ... return 1; } > > /* ANSI */ > int somefunc(char *x, int *y) > { ... return 1; } > > Either way, the results of the DocBook conversion lose the type > information for the parameters, so it's not K&R format either. Since > OpenSSL makes fairly extensive use of callbacks, the need for the > functions that get and set them to be well-documented is extremely > important. > > > WhenI find out how to get them back I'll let you know. > > It may be deliberate, but I can't see why. > > Neither can I. The official docs really can't be put into DocBook > until this oversight is corrected -- but there's no reason why initial > work can't be done pending the bugfix. > > -Kyle H > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List [email protected] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
