http://docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/funcsynopsis.html
Norm thinks he's fixed it.
I can't argue.
Do you guys agree with him,
see the K&R vs Ansi examples?
regards DaveP
(See the support you get with docbook :-)
> Only parameterization is to use K&R or ANSI format (do you understand
> the difference?)
/* K&R */
int somefunc(x, y)
char *x, int *y
{ ... return 1; }
/* ANSI */
int somefunc(char *x, int *y)
{ ... return 1; }
Either way, the results of the DocBook conversion lose the type
information for the parameters, so it's not K&R format either. Since
OpenSSL makes fairly extensive use of callbacks, the need for the
functions that get and set them to be well-documented is extremely
important.
> WhenI find out how to get them back I'll let you know.
> It may be deliberate, but I can't see why.
Neither can I. The official docs really can't be put into DocBook
until this oversight is corrected -- but there's no reason why initial
work can't be done pending the bugfix.
-Kyle H
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [email protected]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [email protected]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
