On Thu, Nov 18, 2010, Richard Levitte wrote: > I'm trying to catch up on VMS fixes, and with the 0.9.8 and 1.0.0 > series, it seems pretty straightforward. > > With 1.0.1 (in development), it seems like things are going down, > pretty much. >
At least with 1.0.1 we can totally overhaul the thing (subject to binary compatibility) as nothing is set in stone. TBH it looks like most of the stuff in dtls1.h shouldn't be touched by applications anyway: although those structures were exposed in 1.0.0. Is anything likely to be broken by making the lot opaque except for the DTLS code that needs it? Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
