In message <20101122134624.ga55...@openssl.org> on Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:46:24 +0100, "Dr. Stephen Henson" <st...@openssl.org> said:
steve> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010, Richard Levitte wrote: steve> steve> > In message <20101118.230638.437297155.rich...@levitte.org> on Thu, 18 Nov 2010 23:06:38 +0100 (CET), Richard Levitte <rich...@levitte.org> said: steve> > steve> > richard> I'm trying to catch up on VMS fixes, and with the 0.9.8 and 1.0.0 steve> > richard> series, it seems pretty straightforward. steve> > richard> steve> > richard> With 1.0.1 (in development), it seems like things are going down, steve> > richard> pretty much. steve> > steve> > Uhmmm, actually, I was talking about the main trunk, 1.1.0-dev. steve> > 1.0.1-dev seems fine, for now... steve> > steve> steve> Well timeval is also used in dtls1.h in 1.0.0 and 1.0.1. The dtls1.h headers steve> are also inconsistent between 1.0.1-dev and 1.1.0-dev steve> steve> Trawling through CVS it looks like: steve> steve> http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=18514 steve> steve> was never committed to 1.1.0. Does that fix it? I'll test that. If that fixes the problem, it's great! Cheers, Richard -- Richard Levitte rich...@levitte.org http://richard.levitte.org/ "Life is a tremendous celebration - and I'm invited!" -- from a friend's blog, translated from Swedish ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
