Change of subject, this part of the thread isn't so much TPM any more... In message <1479823032.8937.37.ca...@infradead.org> on Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:57:12 +0000, David Woodhouse <dw...@infradead.org> said:
dwmw2> On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 14:18 +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: dwmw2> > dwmw2> > Just let me shamelessly mention my STORE effort again ;-) dwmw2> > Among others, it does attempt to solve that very problem (in the dwmw2> > 'file' scheme handler). dwmw2> dwmw2> Neat. Note that I have a ready-made test suite for you in OpenConnect: dwmw2> http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/openconnect.git/blob/HEAD:/tests/Makefile.am dwmw2> dwmw2> For every one of the key files therein, does your current dwmw2> implementation work? :) Nope, not even for all the PEM files... I'm seeing a number of them (I noticed the PKCS#8 ones in particular) that don't return any data at all. I haven't look that deeply into PEM_X509_INFO_read_bio before, and it seems to only cover a subset of all the types we recognise. Considering it's undocumented, I'm wondering if that's the right function to pursue. The other option is to create a function in the 'file' scheme loader that does the same thing but with a table of handlers. I'm quite fine with that idea... Cheers, Richard -- Richard Levitte levi...@openssl.org OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/ -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
