> Now, the initial posting went to both the OMC and the project list, > and some chose to vote with a simple "Reply All" without editing the > recipients. If that was on purpose or because attention wasn't payed > to that detail, I cannot say.
For my part, it was just a reply-all - but if I had stopped to look at the details I still would have done a reply-all - as there is nothing in this vote that needs to be kept private in my view. I guess it is a choice for each OMC member as to whether or not they make their actual votes public - the summary results will be - but the actual votes were indeed meant to be on openssl-omc only. It would also have been good for the text to be attached - especially when we are sending vote details to openssl-project. Tim.
_______________________________________________ openssl-project mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project