On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:40:29PM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
> In message <20180214212414.ga13...@roeckx.be> on Wed, 14 Feb 2018 22:24:14 
> +0100, Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> said:
> 
> kurt> The call for votes should probably also not go to the project list
> kurt> based on that current rules say that we vote on the omc list
> kurt> afaik.
> 
> This is exactly contrary to what we agreed on at the last f2f, apart
> from *certain* votes (such as invitation of new people).

I think that what we agreed to is that the text to vote on should
be discussed on the project list before the vote, and that the
vote should happen on the omc list. Since the vote happens on the
omc list, I see no reason to send the call for votes to the
project list, I only see it as confusing.

Note that I have no problem with voting in public, but then
everybody should vote in public. If some people vote in public and
others don't, the summary might give enough information about what
the others voted. So I think we should either all vote in public,
or nobody should vote in public.


Kurt

_______________________________________________
openssl-project mailing list
openssl-project@openssl.org
https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project

Reply via email to