On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 06:25:28AM +0000, Masayuki Igawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First, thank you to an anonymous for updating this list!
> -> GET /{project_id}/servers/:server_id/diagnostics
>
> And, I have updated: Nova API List for Missing Tempest Tests.
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmYuZ6T4IJETdEVNTWlYVUVOWURmOERSZ0VGc1BBQWc
>
> The summary of this list:
> different count from
> Tested or not # of APIs ratio the last time
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Tested API 124 49.6% +2
> Not Tested API 66 26.4% -2
> Not Need to Test(*1) 60 24.0% 0
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Total(*2): 250 100.0% 0
> (*1) Because they are deprecated APIs such as nova-network and volume.
> (*2) not included v3 APIs
>
> The tempest version is:
> commit f55f4e54ceab7c6a4d330f92c8059e46233e3560
> Merge: 86ab238 062e30a
> Author: Jenkins <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon Oct 14 15:55:59 2013 +0000
>
> By the way, I saw a design summit proposal related to this topic(*3). I think
> this information should be generated automatically. So I'd like to talk about
> this topic at the summit session.
> (*3) Coverage analysis tooling: http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/171
I'm glad that others have an interest in this topic. I've started an etherpad
for that discussion here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-summit-qa-coverage-tooling
Right now it's a very rough outline, without much on it. I'm planning to add
more later. But, feel free to add any discussion points or information that you
think needs to be a part of the session.
-Matt Treinish
>
> This information would be useful for creating Tempest tests.
> Any comments/questions/suggestions are welcome.
>
> Best Regards,
> -- Masayuki Igawa
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > # I'm sorry for this resending because my last mail has unnecessary
> > messages.
> >
> >
> > I have updated: Nova API List for Missing Tempest Tests.
> >
> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmYuZ6T4IJETdEVNTWlYVUVOWURmOERSZ0VGc1BBQWc
> >
> > The summary of this list:
> > different count from
> > Tested or not # of APIs ratio the last time
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > Tested API 122 48.8% +5
> > Not Tested API 68 27.2% -5
> > Not Need to Test(*1) 60 24.0% 0
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > Total(*2): 250 100.0% 0
> >
> > (*1) Because they are deprecated APIs such as nova-network and volume.
> > (*2) not included v3 APIs
> >
> > I hope this information would be helpful for creating Tempest tests.
> > Any comments and questions are welcome.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > -- Masayuki Igawa
> >
> >
> > > Hi, Tempest developers
> > >
> > > I have made:
> > > Nova API List for Missing Tempest Tests.
> > >
> > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmYuZ6T4IJETdEVNTWlYVUVOWURmOERSZ0VGc1BBQWc
> > >
> > > This list shows what we should test. That is:
> > > * Nova has 250 APIs(not include v3 APIs).
> > > * 117 APIs are executed(maybe tested).
> > > * 73 APIs are not executed.
> > > * 60 APIs are not executed. But they maybe not need to test.
> > > -> Because they are deprecated APIs such as nova-network and volume.
> > >
> > > So I think we need more tempest test cases.
> > > If this idea is acceptable, can you put your name to 'assignee' at your
> > > favorites,
> > > and implement tempest tests.
> > >
> > > Any comments are welcome.
> > >
> > > Additional information:
> > > I made this API list with modification of nova's code that based on
> > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/25882/ (Abandoned).
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > -- Masayuki Igawa
> > >
> > >
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
