> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Laski [mailto:andrew.la...@rackspace.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 3:22 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][object] One question to the resource > tracker session > > On 11/13/13 at 11:12pm, Jiang, Yunhong wrote: > >Hi, Dan Smith and all, > > I noticed followed statement in 'Icehouse tasks' in > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IcehouseNovaExtensibleSchedulerMetr > ics > > > > convert resource tracker to objects > > make resoruce tracker extensible > > no db migrations ever again!! > > extra specs to cover resources - use a name space > > > > How is it planned to achieve the 'no db migrations ever again'? Even > with the object, we still need keep resource information in database. And > when new resource type added, we either add a new column to the table. > Or it means we merge all resource information into a single column as json > string and parse it in the resource tracker object?. > > You're right, it's not really achievable without moving to a schemaless > persistence model. I'm fairly certain it was added to be humorous and > should not be considered an outcome of that session.
Andrew, thanks for the explanation. Not sure anyone have interests on this task, otherwise I will take it. --jyh > > > > >Thanks > >--jyh > > > >_______________________________________________ > >OpenStack-dev mailing list > >OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
