Which of these bugs would be appropriate to use for the fix to strong_store - it affects lockutils and rpc, both of which are going to create havoc :)
-Rob On 21 November 2013 07:19, Salvatore Orlando <sorla...@nicira.com> wrote: > I've noticed that > https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/85332012dede96fa6729026c2a90594ea0502ac5 > stores the network client in local.strong_store which is a reference to > corolocal.local (the class, not the instance). > > In Russell's example instead the code accesses local.store which is an > instance of WeakLocal (inheriting from corolocal.local). > > Perhaps then Roman's findings apply to the issue being observed on the gate. > > Regards, > Salvatore > > > On 20 November 2013 18:32, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 11/20/2013 12:21 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote: >> > Nope, you're totally right, corolocal.local is a class, whose instances >> > are the actual coroutine local storage. >> >> But I don't think his example is what is being used. >> >> Here is an example using the openstack.common.local module, which is >> what nova uses for this. This produces the expected output. >> >> http://paste.openstack.org/show/53687/ >> >> >> https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tree/nova/openstack/common/local.py >> >> For reference, original example from OP: >> http://paste.openstack.org/show/53686/ >> >> -- >> Russell Bryant >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
