I think IRC is more effective for real time collaboration then waiting a week
for a meeting. We shouldn’t have to rant at all since we are all part of
OpenStack ☺
Regards
-steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Michał Jastrzębski <inc...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Date: Monday, February 27, 2017 at 5:52 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next
steps for cross project collaboration
So first, I'd like to say that my poor English skills aren't enough to
emphasize how much I love this idea.
I think instead of adding yet-another-irc-channel how about create
weekly meetings? We can rant in scheduled time and it probably will
get more attention. That, mailing list with dedicated tag and WG would
be great imho. We could get some room in future PTGs too then.
Am I making sense?
Michal
On 27 February 2017 at 13:08, Jesse Pretorius
<jesse.pretor...@rackspace.co.uk> wrote:
> Comments in-line
>
> On 2/27/17, 4:02 PM, "Steven Hardy" <sha...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> If I go ahead and do this is "deployment" a sufficiently
project-neutral
> term to proceed with?
>
> I think so.
>
> I'd suggest we start with an informal WG, which it seems just
requires an
> update to the wiki, e.g no need for any formal project team at this
point?
>
> A WG is what I had in mind.
>
> Likewise I know some folks have expressed an interest in an IRC
channel
> (openstack-deployment?), I'm happy to start with the ML but open to
IRC
> also if someone is willing to set up the channel.
>
> Personally I think we should use #openstack-dev instead. It’s the
traditional place for cross-project communication, is less exclusive and much
like this mailing list brings more people into the conversation.
>
> Perhaps we can start by using the tag "deployment" in all
cross-project ML
> traffic, then potentially discuss IRC (or even regular meetings) if it
> becomes apparrent these would add value beyond ML discussion?
>
> Sure, I don’t have any strong feelings about the tag. The tag
[deployment] makes sense to me.
>
>
> ________________________________
> Rackspace Limited is a company registered in England & Wales (company
registered number 03897010) whose registered office is at 5 Millington Road,
Hyde Park Hayes, Middlesex UB3 4AZ. Rackspace Limited privacy policy can be
viewed at www.rackspace.co.uk/legal/privacy-policy - This e-mail message may
contain confidential or privileged information intended for the recipient. Any
dissemination, distribution or copying of the enclosed material is prohibited.
If you receive this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by
e-mail at ab...@rackspace.com and delete the original message. Your cooperation
is appreciated.
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
