Robert, I believe some code is in Ironic too [1]. The 2 choices are in Oslo are:
1) copy code to oslo-incubator 2) start a new oslo.objects(?) repo In the summit meeting, we have been trying to break existing code into libraries so #1 is probably counter-productive. If the code churn in the files are slowed down quite a bit, #2 is a much better option IMHO. It's still under oslo but as a separate library. [1] https://github.com/openstack/ironic/tree/master/ironic/objects On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Robert Collins <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/57022/7//COMMIT_MSG - I > strongly suggested here that reusing the Nova object code is the first > step towards an objects library, and that we should be putting it in > olso; there are some reasonable concerns about this being experimental > but... > > The Oslo wiki page says: > The process of developing a new Oslo API usually begins by taking code > which is common to some OpenStack projects and moving it into the > oslo-incubator repository. New APIs live in the incubator until they > have matured to meet the criteria described above. > > So if this code lands in solum as-is, its now common - to me that > means we should be going straight to oslo.incubator and working on > shared code. > > However there's clearly an expectation mismatch - so - any thoughts? > > -Rob > > > -- > Robert Collins <[email protected]> > Distinguished Technologist > HP Converged Cloud > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
