Sure, no one has said it. But it seems to be implied, otherwise these types of discussions wouldn't occur. Right?
On 12/3/13 2:25 PM, "Mark McLoughlin" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 22:07 +0000, Joshua Harlow wrote: > >> Process for process sake imho has been a problem for oslo. > >It's been reiterated many times, but again - the only purpose of >oslo-incubator is as a place to evolve an API until we're ready to make >a commitment to API stability. > >It's often easier to start a new API completely standalone, push it to >PyPI and plan for API backwards compatibility from the start. No-one has >ever said that such APIs need to go through oslo-incubator "for process >sake". > >Mark. > > >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-dev mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
