On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 02:57:20PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Sean Dague wrote: > > [...] > > I think those are all fine. The other term that popped into my head was > > "Friends of OpenStack" as a way to describe the openstack-hosted efforts > > that aren't official projects. It may be too informal, but I do think > > the OpenStack-Hosted vs. OpenStack might still mix up in people's head. > > My original thinking was to call them "hosted projects" or "host > projects", but then it felt a bit incomplete. I kinda like the "Friends > of OpenStack" name, although it seems to imply some kind of vetting that > we don't actually do. > > An alternative would be to give "the OpenStack project infrastructure" > some kind of a brand name (say, "Opium", for OpenStack project > infrastructure ultimate madness) and then call the hosted projects > "Opium projects". Rename the Infra team to Opium team, and voilà! > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx)
Hmm, I like the concept. Giing it a "brand" would make it something identifiable while still creating a separation from OpenStack as a whole. Not sure about the name, but I like this direction more than "OpenStack Hosted". __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
