On Thu, Jun 15 2017, Doug Hellmann wrote: > One of the *most* common complaints the TC gets from outside the > contributor community is that people do not understand what projects > are part of OpenStack and what parts are not. We have a clear > definition of that in our minds (the projects that have said they > want to be part of OpenStack, and agreed to put themselves under > TC governance, with all of the policies that implies). That definition > is so trivial to say, that it seems like a tautology. However, > looking in from the outside of the community, that definition isn't > helpful.
I still wonder why they care. Who care, really? Can we have some people that care on this thread so they explain directly what we're trying to solve here? Everything is just a bunch of free software projects to me. The governance made zero difference in my contributions or direction of the projects I PTL'ed. (There's so much effort put around trivial things like that. Why do I read only 20 emails in the "Glance is dying" thread and already 55 in that "let's rename big tent". Sigh. -- Julien Danjou /* Free Software hacker https://julien.danjou.info */
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
