On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 4:45 PM Jeremy Stanley <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2017-06-15 11:15:36 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: > [...] > > I'd like to propose that we introduce a new concept: "OpenStack-Hosted > > projects". There would be "OpenStack projects" on one side, and > > "Projects hosted on OpenStack infrastructure" on the other side (all > > still under the openstack/ git repo prefix). > > I'm still unconvinced a term is needed for this. Can't we just have > "OpenStack Projects" (those under TC governance) and "everything > else?" Why must the existence of any term require a term for its > opposite? > +1! We don't need to try and bring everything which is not an OpenStack project under a single name which will also then require a definition which may not fit all. Andrea Frittoli (andreaf) > > > We'll stop saying "official OpenStack project" and "unofficial > > OpenStack project". The only "OpenStack projects" will be the > > official ones. We'll chase down the last mentions of "big tent" in > > documentation and remove it from our vocabulary. > [...] > > I agree on getting rid of the "big tent" phrase anywhere we find it, > though I thought we'd already avoided using that in favor of more > descriptive terminology anyway. Also I'm very excited to see a focus > on "OpenStack projects" I just don't see a benefit to making up a > name for "not an OpenStack project." > -- > Jeremy Stanley > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
