On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Derek Higgins <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12 July 2017 at 22:33, Emilien Macchi <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Emilien Macchi <[email protected]> wrote: >> [...] >>> Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006 >>> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802). I was wondering how it >>> would work with multinode jobs. >> >> Derek, I also would like to point out that >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802 is missing the environment >> file for non-containerized deployments & and also the pingtest file. >> Just for the record, if we can have it before the job moves in gate. > > I knew I had left out the ping test file, this is the next step but I > can create a noop one for now if you'd like?
Please create a basic pingtest with common things we have in other scenarios. > Is the non-containerized deployments a requirement? Until we stop supporting non-containerized deployments, I would say yes. >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> Emilien Macchi So if you create a libvirt domain, would it be possible to do it on scenario004 for example and keep coverage for other services that are already on scenario004? It would avoid to consume a scenario just for Ironic. If not possible, then talk with Flavio and one of you will have to prepare scenario007 or 0008, depending where Numans is in his progress to have OVN coverage as well. Thanks, -- Emilien Macchi __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
