On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Emilien Macchi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Derek Higgins <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 12 July 2017 at 22:33, Emilien Macchi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Emilien Macchi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> [...] >>>> Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006 >>>> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802). I was wondering how it >>>> would work with multinode jobs. >>> >>> Derek, I also would like to point out that >>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802 is missing the environment >>> file for non-containerized deployments & and also the pingtest file. >>> Just for the record, if we can have it before the job moves in gate. >> >> I knew I had left out the ping test file, this is the next step but I >> can create a noop one for now if you'd like? > > Please create a basic pingtest with common things we have in other scenarios. > >> Is the non-containerized deployments a requirement? > > Until we stop supporting non-containerized deployments, I would say yes. > >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -- >>> Emilien Macchi > > So if you create a libvirt domain, would it be possible to do it on > scenario004 for example and keep coverage for other services that are > already on scenario004? It would avoid to consume a scenario just for > Ironic. If not possible, then talk with Flavio and one of you will > have to prepare scenario007 or 0008, depending where Numans is in his > progress to have OVN coverage as well.
I haven't seen much resolution / answers about it. We still have the conflict right now and open questions. Derek, Flavio - let's solve this one this week if we can. Thanks, -- Emilien Macchi __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
