On 07/12/13 04:42, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: >> On 7 December 2013 08:15, Jay Dobies <jason.dob...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> Disclaimer: I'm very new to the project, so apologies if some of my >>> questions have been already answered or flat out don't make sense. >> >> >> NP :) >> >> >>>> * optional node profile for a resource class (M) >>>> * acts as filter for nodes that can be allocated to that >>>> class (M) >>> >>> >>> To my understanding, once this is in Icehouse, we'll have to support >>> upgrades. If this filtering is pushed off, could we get into a situation >>> where an allocation created in Icehouse would no longer be valid in >>> Icehouse+1 once these filters are in place? If so, we might want to make it >>> more of a priority to get them in place earlier and not eat the headache of >>> addressing these sorts of integrity issues later. >> >> We need to be wary of over-implementing now; a lot of the long term >> picture is moving Tuskar prototype features into proper homes like >> Heat and Nova; so the more we implement now the more we have to move. >> >>>> * Unallocated nodes >>> >>> >>> Is there more still being flushed out here? Things like: >>> * Listing unallocated nodes >>> * Unallocating a previously allocated node (does this make it a vanilla >>> resource or does it retain the resource type? is this the only way to >>> change >>> a node's resource type?) >> >> Nodes don't have resource types. Nodes are machines Ironic knows >> about, and thats all they are. > > Once nodes are assigned by nova scheduler, would it be accurate to say that > they > have an implicit resource type? Or am I missing the point entirely? > >>> * Unregistering nodes from Tuskar's inventory (I put this under >>> unallocated >>> under the assumption that the workflow will be an explicit unallocate >>> before >>> unregister; I'm not sure if this is the same as "archive" below). >> >> Tuskar shouldn't have an inventory of nodes. > > Would it be correct to say that Ironic has an inventory of nodes, and that we > may > want to remove a node from Ironic's inventory?
right, in which case (needs to be clarified): Tuskar doesn't store info about nodes BUT Tuskar (??) the Tuskar UI (??) uses a client to fetch info directly from Ironic on demand (from the UI). ?? > > Mainn > >> -Rob >> >> >> -- >> Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> >> Distinguished Technologist >> HP Converged Cloud >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev