On Dec 9, 2013, at 8:58 AM, James Slagle <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Matt Wagner <[email protected]> wrote: >>> - As an infrastructure administrator, Anna expects that the >>> management node for the deployment services is already up and running >>> and the status of this node is shown in the UI. >> >> The 'management node' here is the undercloud node that Anna is >> interacting with, as I understand it. (Someone correct me if I'm wrong.) >> So it's not a bad idea to show its status, but I guess the mere fact >> that she's using it will indicate that it's operational. > > That's how I read it as well, which assumes that you're using the > undercloud to manage itself. > > FWIW, based on the OpenStack personas I think that Anna would be the > one doing the undercloud setup. So, maybe this use case should be: > > - As an infrastructure administrator, Anna wants to install the > undercloud so she can use the UI. > > That piece is going to be a pretty big part of the entire deployment > process, so I think having a use case for it makes sense. +1. I've added this as the very first use case. > > Nice work on the use cases Liz, thanks for pulling them together. Thanks to all for the great discussion on these use cases. The questions/comments that they've generated is exactly what I was hoping for. I will continue to make updates and refine these[1] based on discussions. Of course, feel free to add to/change these yourself as well. Liz [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/Tuskar/IcehouseUserStories > > -- > -- James Slagle > -- > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
