I'm +1 for 'provider'. 2013/12/9 Akihiro Motoki <mot...@da.jp.nec.com>: > Neutron defines "provider" attribute and it is/will be used in advanced > services (LB, FW, VPN). > Doesn't it fit for a distributed router case? If we can cover all services > with one concept, it would be nice. > > According to this thread, we assumes at least two types "edge" and > "distributed". > Though "edge" and "distributed" is a type of implementations, I think they > are some kind of "provider". > > I just would like to add an option. I am open to "provider" vs "distirbute" > attributes. > > Thanks, > Akihiro > > (2013/12/10 7:01), Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville) wrote: >> Hi Folks, >> >> We are in the process of defining the API for the Neutron Distributed >> Virtual Router, and we have a question. >> >> Just wanted to get the feedback from the community before we implement and >> post for review. >> >> We are planning to use the “distributed” flag for the routers that are >> supposed to be routing traffic locally (both East West and North South). >> This “distributed” flag is already there in the “neutronclient” API, but >> currently only utilized by the “Nicira Plugin”. >> We would like to go ahead and use the same “distributed” flag and add an >> extension to the router table to accommodate the “distributed flag”. >> >> Please let us know your feedback. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Swaminathan Vasudevan >> Systems Software Engineer (TC) >> HP Networking >> Hewlett-Packard >> 8000 Foothills Blvd >> M/S 5541 >> Roseville, CA - 95747 >> tel: 916.785.0937 >> fax: 916.785.1815 >> email: swaminathan.vasude...@hp.com <mailto:swaminathan.vasude...@hp.com> >> > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev