Excerpts from Andreas Jaeger's message of 2018-05-01 21:51:19 +0200: > On 05/01/2018 04:08 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > The TC has had an item on our backlog for a while (a year?) to > > document "constellations" of OpenStack components to make it easier > > for deployers and users to understand which parts they need to have > > the features they want [1]. > > > > John Garbutt has started writing the first such document [2], but > > as we talked about the content we agreed the TC governance repository > > is not the best home for it, so I have proposed creating a new > > repository [3]. > > > > In order to set up the publishing jobs for that repo so the content > > goes to docs.openstack.org, we need to settle the ownership of the > > repository. > > > > I think it makes sense for the documentation team to "own" it, but > > I also think it makes sense for it to have its own review team > > because it's a bit different from the rest of the docs and we may > > be able to recruit folks to help who might not want to commit to > > being core reviewers for all of the documentation repositories. The > > TC members would also like to be reviewers, to get things going. > > > > So, is the documentation team willing to add the new "constellations" > > repository under their umbrella? Or should we keep it as a TC-owned > > repository for now? > > I'm fine having it as parts of the docs team. The docs PTL should be > part of the review team for sure, > > Andreas
Yeah, I wasn't really clear there: I intend to set up the documentation and TC teams as members of the new team, so that all members of both groups can be reviewers of the new repository. Doug __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
