Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2018-05-02 11:38:55 -0400: > On 01/05/18 16:21, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Andreas Jaeger's message of 2018-05-01 21:51:19 +0200: > >> On 05/01/2018 04:08 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > >>> The TC has had an item on our backlog for a while (a year?) to > >>> document "constellations" of OpenStack components to make it easier > >>> for deployers and users to understand which parts they need to have > >>> the features they want [1]. > >>> > >>> John Garbutt has started writing the first such document [2], but > >>> as we talked about the content we agreed the TC governance repository > >>> is not the best home for it, so I have proposed creating a new > >>> repository [3]. > >>> > >>> In order to set up the publishing jobs for that repo so the content > >>> goes to docs.openstack.org, we need to settle the ownership of the > >>> repository. > >>> > >>> I think it makes sense for the documentation team to "own" it, but > >>> I also think it makes sense for it to have its own review team > >>> because it's a bit different from the rest of the docs and we may > >>> be able to recruit folks to help who might not want to commit to > >>> being core reviewers for all of the documentation repositories. The > >>> TC members would also like to be reviewers, to get things going. > >>> > >>> So, is the documentation team willing to add the new "constellations" > >>> repository under their umbrella? Or should we keep it as a TC-owned > >>> repository for now? > >> > >> I'm fine having it as parts of the docs team. The docs PTL should be > >> part of the review team for sure, > >> > >> Andreas > > > > Yeah, I wasn't really clear there: I intend to set up the documentation > > and TC teams as members of the new team, so that all members of both > > groups can be reviewers of the new repository. > > +1. What would be the reviewer criteria? Majority vote for adding new > constellations and 2x +2 for changes maybe? Or just 2x +2 for > everything? Just to clarify, since the TC reviews usually operate pretty > differently to other code reviews. > > thanks, > ZB >
This is just documentation, so 2x +2 is what I had in mind. Doug __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
