On 02/05/18 20:11, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2018-05-02 11:38:55 -0400: >> On 01/05/18 16:21, Doug Hellmann wrote: >>> Excerpts from Andreas Jaeger's message of 2018-05-01 21:51:19 +0200: >>>> On 05/01/2018 04:08 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >>>>> The TC has had an item on our backlog for a while (a year?) to >>>>> document "constellations" of OpenStack components to make it easier >>>>> for deployers and users to understand which parts they need to have >>>>> the features they want [1]. >>>>> >>>>> John Garbutt has started writing the first such document [2], but >>>>> as we talked about the content we agreed the TC governance repository >>>>> is not the best home for it, so I have proposed creating a new >>>>> repository [3]. >>>>> >>>>> In order to set up the publishing jobs for that repo so the content >>>>> goes to docs.openstack.org, we need to settle the ownership of the >>>>> repository. >>>>> >>>>> I think it makes sense for the documentation team to "own" it, but >>>>> I also think it makes sense for it to have its own review team >>>>> because it's a bit different from the rest of the docs and we may >>>>> be able to recruit folks to help who might not want to commit to >>>>> being core reviewers for all of the documentation repositories. The >>>>> TC members would also like to be reviewers, to get things going. >>>>> >>>>> So, is the documentation team willing to add the new "constellations" >>>>> repository under their umbrella? Or should we keep it as a TC-owned >>>>> repository for now? >>>> >>>> I'm fine having it as parts of the docs team. The docs PTL should be >>>> part of the review team for sure, >>>> >>>> Andreas >>> >>> Yeah, I wasn't really clear there: I intend to set up the documentation >>> and TC teams as members of the new team, so that all members of both >>> groups can be reviewers of the new repository. >> >> +1. What would be the reviewer criteria? Majority vote for adding new >> constellations and 2x +2 for changes maybe? Or just 2x +2 for >> everything? Just to clarify, since the TC reviews usually operate pretty >> differently to other code reviews. >> >> thanks, >> ZB >> > > This is just documentation, so 2x +2 is what I had in mind. > > Doug >
Is it just docs though? I thought the the point of constellations was for a curated set of projects per use case?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
