On 19/12/13 01:28 -0800, John Dickinson wrote:
Another option would be to use what we already have to our benefit. Instead of 
trying to provision two meeting rooms (-meeting and -meeting-alt), use the 
various other IRC channels that we already have for team meetings. This would 
allow for meetings to be at the same time, but it would free up more time slots 
to be scheduled, and those time slots can be scheduled more precisely to fit 
the schedules of those attending.

So what about cross-team concerns? We have the weekly meeting, and if that 
isn't sufficient, then the -meeting and -meeting-alt channels can be scheduled 
for cross-team needs.

+1

I was thinking the exact same thing while reading Robert's email. I
guess we should also consider new projects that don't have a channel
yet. Just as you mentioned, they could use -meeting or -meeting-alt.

Marconi's team has had several 'extra' meetings - mostly for
brainstorming about a specific argument - in #openstack-marconi. All
this meetings where announced properly and worked just fine.

We've done the same for Glance.

I'd like to add that, although I prefer keeping the meetings short,
there are times where 1h may not be enough and people end up using
other team's time or dropping the meeting. Using the project's channel
should help with this as well.


Cheers,
FF


--John




On Dec 19, 2013, at 1:20 AM, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net> wrote:

So, I'm a little worried about the complexities of organising free
slots given we're basically about to double the # of entrieshave in
all our calendars.

Maybe we can do something a little simpler: just have the *whole
calender* shift phase 180' each week: it won't be perfect,
particularly for those projects that currently have a majority of
members meeting in the middle of their day (12 midday -> 12 midnight),
but if there's any decent spread already meeting, there will be a
decent spread for the alter week - and an important thing for
inclusion is to not be doing votes etc in meetings *anyway* so I think
it's ok for the PTL (for instance) to not be at every meeting.

Thoughts?

-Rob

--
Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com>
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco

Attachment: pgpbi1gy9OB8q.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to