On 12/19/2013 04:28 AM, John Dickinson wrote: > Another option would be to use what we already have to our benefit. Instead > of trying to provision two meeting rooms (-meeting and -meeting-alt), use the > various other IRC channels that we already have for team meetings. This would > allow for meetings to be at the same time, but it would free up more time > slots to be scheduled, and those time slots can be scheduled more precisely > to fit the schedules of those attending. > > So what about cross-team concerns? We have the weekly meeting, and if that > isn't sufficient, then the -meeting and -meeting-alt channels can be > scheduled for cross-team needs.
I'm generally -1 to this. I idle in #openstack-meeting and
#openstack-meeting-alt, and periodically go look at what's going on. It
also means if someone pings me in a meeting, I'm likely to see it. This
level of passive monitoring on the meetings is I think useful.
If a particular team wants to take their meetings out of the main
channels, so be it, but I think the norm should be to continue to use
those channels.
-Sean
--
Sean Dague
Samsung Research America
s...@dague.net / sean.da...@samsung.com
http://dague.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
