On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:59:47AM -0500, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Aug 17, 2018, at 10:51 AM, Chris Dent <cdent...@anticdent.org> wrote: > > > > One of the questions that has come up on the etherpad is about how > > placement should be positioned, as a project, after the extraction. > > The options are: > > > > * A repo within the compute project > > * Its own project, either: > > * working towards being official and governed > > * official and governed from the start > > I would like to hear from the Cinder and Neutron teams, especially those who > were around when those compute sub-projects were split off into their own > projects. Did you feel that being independent of compute helped or hindered > you? And to those who are in those projects now, is there any sense that > things would be better if you were still part of compute? >
I wasn't around at the beginning of the separation, but I don't think Cinder would be anything like it is today (you can decide if that's a good thing or not) if it had remained a component of Nova. > My opinion has been that Placement should have been separate from the start. > The longer we keep Placement inside of Nova, the more painful it will be to > extract, and hence the likelihood of that every happening is greatly > diminished. I have to agree with this statement. > > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
