> > Has there been a discussion on record of how use of placement by cinder > would affect "standalone" cinder (or manila) initiatives where there is a > desire to be able to run cinder by itself (with no-auth) or just with > keystone (where OpenStack style multi-tenancy is desired)? > > Tom Barron (tbarron) >
A little bit. That would be one of the pieces that needs to be done if we were to adopt it. Just high level brainstorming, but I think we would need something like we have now with using tooz where if it is configured for it, it will use etcd for distributed locking. And for single node installs it just defaults to file locks. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
