On 20/12/13 17:34, Clint Byrum wrote: > OpenStack is non-deterministic. Deterministic systems are rigid and unable > to handle failure modes of any kind of diversity.
I wonder how you are going to debug a non-deterministic system :-) > We tend to err toward > pushing problems back to the user and giving them tools to resolve the > problem. Avoiding spurious problems is important too, no doubt. However, > what Jay has been suggesting is that the situation a pessimistic locking > system would avoid is entirely user created, and thus lower priority > than say, actually having a complete UI for deploying OpenStack. I fail to see how leaving ourselves the ability to add locks when they become needed, by keeping tuskar-api in place, conflicts with actually having a complete UI for deploying OpenStack. Can you elaborate on that? -- Radomir Dopieralski _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
