> -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Dague [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 27 January 2014 14:26 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards > > On 01/27/2014 09:07 AM, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote: > > Hi Sean, > > > > I'm currently working on moving away from the "built-in" logging to use > log_config=<filename> and the python logging framework so that we can start > shipping to logstash/sentry/<insert other useful tool here>. > > > > I'd be very interested in getting involved in this, especially from a "why > > do we > have log messages that are split across multiple lines" perspective! > > Do we have many that aren't either DEBUG or TRACE? I thought we were pretty > clean there. > > > Cheers, > > > > Matt > > > > P.S. FWIW, I'd also welcome details on what the "Audit" level gives us > > that the others don't... :) > > Well as far as I can tell the AUDIT level was a prior drive by contribution > that's > not being actively maintained. Honestly, I think we should probably rip it > out, > because I don't see any in tree tooling to use it, and it's horribly > inconsistent. > > -Sean
Just as an aside, AUDIT was introduced to the Nova code base as part of 05ccbb75c45aa3c348162043495e1a3d279e5b06 however a "grep -r AUDIT *" (yes, I know, crude but it does work! :P ) across the nova codebase only returns the openstack.common.log libraries as having it listed in the code. I don't know if other projects are making use of it, but if not then I agree that it should probably be removed from Oslo Matt _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
