On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:47:07AM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: > Greetings, > > A while back I mentioned that we would revisit the potential deprecation > of nova-network in Icehouse after the icehouse-2 milestone. The time > has come. :-) > > First, let me recap my high level view of the blockers to deprecating > nova-network in favor of Neutron: > > - Feature parity > - The biggest gap here has been nova-network's multi-host mode. > Neutron needs some sort of HA for l3 agents, as well as the > ability to run in a mode that enables a single tenant's traffic > to be actively handled by multiple nodes. > > - Testing / Quality parity > - Neutron needs to reach testing and quality parity in CI. This > includes running the full tempest suite, for example. For all > tests run against nova with nova-network that are applicable, they > need to be run against Neutron, as well. All of these jobs should > have comparable or better reliability than the ones with > nova-network. > > - Production-ready open source components > - nova-network provides basic, but usable in production networking > based purely on open source components. Neutron must have > production-ready options based purely on open source components, > as well, that provides comparable or better performance and > reliability.
What, no mention of providing an automated upgrade path ? Given how we go to great lengths to enable continuous deployment with automated upgrade paths, I'd really expect to see something to deal with migrating people from nova-network to neutron with existing tenants unaffected. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev