On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Russell Bryant <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 01/29/2014 12:45 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > I was thinking of an upgrade path more akin to what users got when we > > removed the nova volume driver, in favour of cinder. > > > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MigrateToCinder > > > > ie no guest visible downtime / interuption of service, nor running of > > multiple Nova instances in parallel. > > Yeah, I'd love to see something like that. I would really like to see > more effort in this area. I honestly haven't been thinking about it > much in a while personally, because the rest of the "make it work" gaps > have still been a work in progress. > > There's a bit of a bigger set of questions here, too ... > > Should nova-network *ever* go away? Or will there always just be a > choice between the basic/legacy nova-network option, and the new fancy > SDN-enabling Neutron option? Is the Neutron team's time better spent on > OpenDaylight integration than the existing open source plugins? > > So if nova-network doesn't go away this has implications for the V3 API as it currently doesn't support nova-network. I'm not sure that we have time to add support for it in icehouse now, but if nova-network is not going to go away then we need to add it to the V3 API or we will be unable to ever deprecate the V2 API. Chris
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
