On 03/28/2014 12:50 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Thierry Carrez wrote: >> Julien Danjou wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 27 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>> >>>> -happybase>=0.4,<=0.6 >>>> +happybase>=0.8 >>> >>> Good for me, and Ceilometer is the only one using happybase as far as I >>> know so that shouldn't be a problem. >> >> OK so I would be fine with "happybase>=0.4,!=0.6,!=0.7" as it allows 0.8 >> to be run without adversely impacting downstreams who don't have it >> available. > > Actually that should be "happybase>=0.4,!=0.7" since 0.6 was allowed before.
The review has comments about 0.7 being the version in Debian and Ubuntu right now https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82438/. Which is problematic, as that's a version that's specifically being called out by the ceilometer team as not useable. Do we know why, and if it can be worked around? -Sean -- Sean Dague Samsung Research America [email protected] / [email protected] http://dague.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
