So how did Ceilometer get into this situation? Because the ceilometer requirements are happybase>=0.4,<=0.6
So we told distributions at Feature Freeze that was adequate version for
ceilometer, and now we're telling them it's not at RC. And that's
honestly too late for most of them.
So I remain -1 on this at this point (if ttx want's to override, that's
his call). And we need to figure out how we don't end up in the same
position in Juno.
-Sean
On 03/28/2014 03:56 PM, Nadya Privalova wrote:
> Sean, please see my comment in bug regarding 0.7. Unfortunately I have
> nothing to suggest here. If distributive contains only 0.7 we cannot
> work with HBase through happybase. And I don't see any solutions.
> But anyway if you change requirements for happybase (I guess we need to
> get 0.7 back, no?) could you please remove 0.4? 0.4 doesn't allow to
> work with pools but we need to.
>
> Thanks,
> Nadya
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Sean Dague <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> On 03/28/2014 12:50 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > Thierry Carrez wrote:
> >> Julien Danjou wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 27 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> -happybase>=0.4,<=0.6
> >>>> +happybase>=0.8
> >>>
> >>> Good for me, and Ceilometer is the only one using happybase as
> far as I
> >>> know so that shouldn't be a problem.
> >>
> >> OK so I would be fine with "happybase>=0.4,!=0.6,!=0.7" as it
> allows 0.8
> >> to be run without adversely impacting downstreams who don't have it
> >> available.
> >
> > Actually that should be "happybase>=0.4,!=0.7" since 0.6 was
> allowed before.
>
> The review has comments about 0.7 being the version in Debian and Ubuntu
> right now https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82438/.
>
> Which is problematic, as that's a version that's specifically being
> called out by the ceilometer team as not useable. Do we know why, and if
> it can be worked around?
>
> -Sean
>
> --
> Sean Dague
> Samsung Research America
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> / [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://dague.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Sean Dague
Samsung Research America
[email protected] / [email protected]
http://dague.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
