Hi folks ExaBGP won't suit for BGPVPN implementation because it isn't support vpnv4. Ryu is supporting it, however they have no internal api to binding neutron network & route target. so I think contrail is a only solution for BGPVPN implementation now.
2014-05-30 2:22 GMT-07:00 Mathieu Rohon <mathieu.ro...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > I was about mentionning ExaBGP too! can we also consider using those > BGP speakers for BGPVPN implementation [1]. > This would be consistent to have the same BGP speaker used for every > BGP needs inside Neutron. > > [1]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93329/ > > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Jaume Devesa <devv...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello Takashi, >> >> thanks for doing this! As we have proposed ExaBgp[1] in the Dynamic Routing >> blueprint[2], I've added a new column for this speaker in the wiki page. I >> plan to fill it soon. >> >> ExaBgp was our first choice because we thought that run something in library >> mode would be much more easy to deal with (especially the exceptions and >> corner cases) and the code would be much cleaner. But seems that Ryu BGP >> also can fit in this requirement. And having the help from a Ryu developer >> like you turns it into a promising candidate! >> >> I'll start working now in a proof of concept to run the agent with these >> implementations and see if we need more requirements to compare between the >> speakers. >> >> [1]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/BGPSpeakersComparison >> [2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90833/ >> >> Regards, >> >> >> On 29 May 2014 18:42, YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamam...@valinux.co.jp> wrote: >>> >>> as per discussions on l3 subteem meeting today, i started >>> a bgp speakers comparison wiki page for this bp. >>> >>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/BGPSpeakersComparison >>> >>> Artem, can you add other requirements as columns? >>> >>> as one of ryu developers, i'm naturally biased to ryu bgp. >>> i appreciate if someone provides more info for other bgp speakers. >>> >>> YAMAMOTO Takashi >>> >>> > Good afternoon Neutron developers! >>> > >>> > There has been a discussion about dynamic routing in Neutron for the >>> > past few weeks in the L3 subteam weekly meetings. I've submitted a review >>> > request of the blueprint documenting the proposal of this feature: >>> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90833/. If you have any feedback or >>> > suggestions for improvement, I would love to hear your comments and >>> > include >>> > your thoughts in the document. >>> > >>> > Thank you. >>> > >>> > Sincerely, >>> > Artem Dmytrenko >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Jaume Devesa >> Software Engineer at Midokura >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev