On 08/06/2014 06:10 PM, Michael Still wrote: > > We also talked about tweaking the ratio of "tech debt" runways vs > 'feature" runways. So, perhaps every second release is focussed on > burning down tech debt and stability, whilst the others are focussed > on adding features. I would suggest if we do such a thing, Kilo should > be a "stability' release.
As an operator i love this idea, i would really like openstack moving to a model more 'ubuntuish' lts, stability focused releases (K) for production, the other (L) release for pre-prod, trunk for labs ;) -- 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333 _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
