On 08/13/2014 07:27 PM, Michael Still wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On 08/13/2014 01:09 PM, Dan Smith wrote: >>> Expecting cores to be at these sorts of things seems pretty reasonable >>> to me, given the usefulness (and gravity) of the discussions we've been >>> having so far. Companies with more cores will have to send more or make >>> some hard decisions, but I don't want to cut back on the meetings until >>> their value becomes unjustified. >> >> I disagree. IMO, *expecting* people to travel, potentially across the >> globe, 4 times a year is an unreasonable expectation, and quite >> uncharacteristic of open source projects. If we can't figure out a way >> to have the most important conversations in a way that is inclusive of >> everyone, we're failing with our processes. > > I am a bit confused by this stance to be honest. You yourself said > when you were Icehouse PTL that you wanted cores to come to the > summit. What changed?
Yes, I would love for core team members to come to the design summit that's twice a year. I still don't *expect* it for them to remain a member of the team, and I certainly don't expect it 4 times a year. It's a matter of frequency and requirement. -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackemail@example.com http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev