On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Sandy Walsh <sandy.wa...@rackspace.com> wrote: > On 8/14/2014 11:28 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: >> On 08/14/2014 10:04 AM, CARVER, PAUL wrote: >>> Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com] wrote: >>> >>>> Depending on the usage needs, I think Google hangouts is a quite useful >>>> technology. For many-to-many session its limit of 10 participants can be >>>> an issue, but for a few-to-many broadcast it could be practical. What I >>>> find particularly appealing is the way it can live stream the session >>>> over youtube which allows for unlimited number of viewers, as well as >>>> being available offline for later catchup. >>> I can't actually offer AT&T resources without getting some level of >>> management approval first, but just for the sake of discussion here's >>> some info about the telepresence system we use. >>> >>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>> ATS B2B Telepresence conferences can be conducted with an external company's >>> Telepresence room(s), which subscribe to the AT&T Telepresence Solution, >>> or a limited number of other Telepresence service provider's networks. >>> >>> Currently, the number of Telepresence rooms that can participate in a B2B >>> conference is limited to a combined total of 20 rooms (19 of which can be >>> AT&T rooms, depending on the number of remote endpoints included). >>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>> >>> We currently have B2B interconnect with over 100 companies and AT&T has >>> telepresence rooms in many of our locations around the US and around >>> the world. If other large OpenStack companies also have telepresence >>> rooms that we could interconnect with I think it might be possible >>> to get management agreement to hold a couple OpenStack meetups per >>> year. >>> >>> Most of our rooms are best suited for 6 people, but I know of at least >>> one 18 person telepresence room near me. >> An ideal solution would allow attendees to join as individuals from >> anywhere. A lot of contributors work from home. Is that sort of thing >> compatible with your system? >> > http://bluejeans.com/ was a good experience. > > What about Google Hangout OnAir for the PTL and core, while others are > view-only with chat/irc questions? > This is a terrible idea, as it perpetuates the "core vs. non-core" argument. We need equal participation for cores and non-cores alike.
> http://www.google.com/+/learnmore/hangouts/onair.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStackemail@example.com > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev