Hi Harm: The changes for the multiple v6 addresses blueprint depend upon 2 Neutron changes that are not in Icehouse, but are merged in the latest upstream: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ipv6-two-attributes https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ipv6-provider-nets-slaac
Also, if you want to use IPv6 SLAAC addresses assigned by Neutron (via RADVD), you'll want some changes for the following blueprint, that are not in Icehouse but are in the latest upstream: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/neutron-ipv6-radvd-ra If you want to use DHCPv6 stateful addresses assigned by Neutron, I believe that you'll need the changes from this blueprint that are still out for review: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/dnsmasq-ipv6-dhcpv6-stateful -Dane -----Original Message----- From: Harm Weites [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 3:21 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack Hi Dane, Thanks, that looks promising. Once support for multiple v6 addresses on gateway ports is added I'll be happy to give this a go. Should it work just fine with an otherwise Icehouse based deployment? Regards, Harm op 16-08-14 20:31, Dane Leblanc (leblancd) schreef: > Hi Harm: > > Can you take a look at the following, which should address this: > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/multiple-ipv6-prefixes > > There are some diffs out for review for this blueprint: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113339/ > but the change to support 1 V4 + multiple V6 addresses on a gateway port > hasn't been added yet. I should be adding this soon. > > There was a request for a Juno feature freeze exception for this blueprint, > but there's been no response, so this may not get approved until K release. > > -Dane > > -----Original Message----- > From: Harm Weites [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 2:22 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack > > Hi, > > Given the work on [1] has been abandoned, I'm wondering what the current > status of going dual stack is. Of course, given Neutron got something like > that on it's roadmap. > > The initial BP [2] aimed for Havana and Icehouse, and I'm unaware of > something similar to achieve a dual stack network. What are the options, if > any? To my knowledge it all comes down to supporting multiple exterior > interfaces (networks) on a l3-agent, which is currently limited to just 1: > either IP4 or IP6. > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77471/ > [2] > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/allow-multiple-subnets- > on-gateway-port > > Regards, > Harm > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
