On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:57:57 -0700 Joe Gordon <joe.gord...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Overall I do think we need to re-think how the review burden is > distributed. That being said, this is a nice proposal but I am not > sure if it moves the review burden around enough or is the right > approach. Do you have any rough numbers on what percent of the review > burden goes to virt drivers today (how ever you want to define that > statement, number of merged patches, man hours, lines of code, number > of reviews etc.). If for example today the nova review team spends > 10% of there review time on virt drivers then I don't think this > proposal will have a significant impact on the review backlog (for > nova-common). Even if it doesn't have a huge impact on the review backlog for nova-common (I think it should at least help a bit) it does have the potential to make life much easier for the virt driver developers. I think my main concern is around testing - as soon as we have multiple repositories involved I think debugging of test failures (especially races) tends to get more complicated and we have fewer people who are familiar enough with the two code bases. Chris _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
