On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I venture to suggest that the reason we care so much about those kind of things is precisely because of our policy of pulling them in the tree. Having them in tree means their quality (or not) reflects directly on the project as a whole. Separate them from Nova as a whole and give them control of their own desinty and they can deal with the consequences of their actions and people can judge the results for themselves.
Apart from any of the other issues present in this thread (and not commenting on them in this message), I think this paragraph (above) represents an unfortunately narrow view about how perceptions of the quality of OpenStack work. People who are invested in using OpenStack in some fashion and are not in the development priesthood see OpenStack. They don't see individual teams making virt drivers. It may be (I don't know) that having more granularity in projects will allow different teams to engage at different rates and thus get stuff done, but I do not think it will do much with regard to external perceptions of quality. That's going to take a much different kind of work and attention. -- Chris Dent tw:@anticdent freenode:cdent https://tank.peermore.com/tanks/cdent _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
