----- Original Message -----
> Hi,
> 
> as part of general housekeeping on our reviews, it was discussed at last
> week's meeting [1] that we should set workflow -1 for stale reviews
> (like gerrit used to do when I were a lad).
> 
> The specific criteria discussed was 'items that have a -1 from a core
> but no response from author for 14 days'. This topic came up again
> during today's meeting and it wasn't clear if the intention was for
> cores to start enforcing this? So:
> 
> Do we start setting WIP/workflow -1 for those reviews that have a -1
> from a core but no response from author for 14 days
> 
> thanks, marios
> 
> [1]
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2014/tripleo.2014-09-09-19.04.log.html

So it looks like this has already started..

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105275/

I think we need to document on the wiki *precisely* the criteria for setting 
WIP/workflow -1. For example that review above has a Jenkins failure but no
core reviews at all.

> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to